Why the study?
Does an algorithm for loading doses of intravenous opioids improve pain relief for patients in the recovery room?
Does an algorithm for loading doses of intravenous opioids improve pain relief for patients in the recovery room?
An audit of recovery room pain management identified inadequate analgesia with PCA and IM opioids, leading to the successful and safe implementation of an algorithm for IV opioid loading doses.
Supports safe adoption of IV opioid loading algorithms in recovery; leaves open efficacy versus PCA/IM opioids in prospective trials.
For this study 334 patients during their stay in the recovery room were assigned to the following groups: ‘comfortable’, in ‘pain’ and in ‘severe pain’. Fourteen per cent of patients awoke from anaesthesia in ‘pain’ and 10% were discharged to the ward in ‘pain’. Thirty‐seven per cent of patients using patient‐controlled analgesia (PCA) in the recovery room were discharged in ‘pain’; 63% of these patients had neither been prescribed nor given a ‘loading dose’ in the recovery room. Forty‐eight per cent of patients receiving sole intramuscular opioid analgesia were discharged in ‘pain’. Ninety per cent who received nurse‐administered ‘prn’ intravenous bolus opioids were discharged ‘comfortable’. An algorithm was therefore developed for the administration of loading doses of intravenous opioids in the recovery unit to be used by recovery nursing staff prior to PCA or other analgesic methods. An early re‐audit established that the algorithm became widely adopted by anaesthetists, was safe and produced comparable discharge pain scores.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Simmonds et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: