Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: Examine the association between military blast exposure and functional status among veterans with a focus on functional disability as a proxy for quality of life and explore the potential modifying effect of hearing loss on this association. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort. SETTING: Multi-institutional tertiary referral centers. PATIENTS: 540 veterans. EXPOSURE: Self-reported military blast exposure with and without tinnitus; high-frequency hearing loss (yes/no). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 questionnaires at baseline and annually over 5 years. The odds of membership into three functional disability trajectory groups: low functional disability, moderate functional disability, and high functional disability. RESULTS: Of 540 veterans, 197 (36.5%) self-reported a blast exposure history, and 106 of 197 (53.8%) reported tinnitus as a direct result of the blast. Blast exposure without tinnitus increased the odds of moderate functional disability compared with low functional disability (odds ratio [OR] = 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92-2.51), which strengthened among those with blast with tinnitus (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 2.1-6.1). Blast exposure without tinnitus also increased the odds of membership to high functional disability versus low functional disability (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.1-4.8). Hearing loss further increased the odds of reporting functional disability. The probability of low functional disability was approximately 60% if there was no history of blast or hearing loss, dropping to 20% if there was blast, tinnitus, and hearing loss history. CONCLUSIONS: Blast exposure negatively affects the quality of life of veterans, especially when compounded with tinnitus and hearing loss.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reavis et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: