Why the study?
Early detection of high-risk individuals is crucial to delay and reduce type 2 diabetes, leading researchers to explore a novel subgroup-specific biomarker strategy for predicting incident diabetes.
Does a gender- and BMI-specific biomarker strategy improve the prediction of incident diabetes compared to traditional risk factors in adults without diabetes?
Does a gender- and BMI-specific biomarker strategy improve the prediction of incident diabetes compared to traditional risk factors in adults without diabetes?
A gender- and BMI-specific biomarker strategy incorporating SCG3 and VAP-1 improves the prediction of incident diabetes compared to traditional risk factors alone.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Subgroup-specific SCG3/VAP-1 biomarkers may refine diabetes prediction in select groups; leaves open whether they improve outcomes in prospective validation.
Introduction The early detection of high‐risk individuals is crucial to delay and reduce the incidence of type 2 diabetes. In this study, we aimed to explore the performance of a novel subgroup‐specific biomarker strategy in the prediction of incident diabetes. Materials and Methods In the Taiwan Lifestyle Cohort Study, adult subjects without diabetes were included and followed for the incidence of diabetes in 2006–2019. The biomarkers measured included blood secretogranin III (SCG3), vascular adhesion protein‐1 (VAP‐1), fibrinogen‐like protein 1 (FGL1), angiopoietin‐like protein 6 (ANGPTL6), and angiopoietin‐like protein 4 (ANGPTL4). Results Among the 1,287 subjects, 12.2% developed diabetes during a 6 year follow‐up. Blood VAP‐1 was significantly associated with incident diabetes in the overall population (HR = 0.724, P < 0.05), participants under 65 years old (HR = 0.685, P < 0.05), those with a BMI of ≥24 kg/m2 (HR = 0.673, P < 0.05), and females (HR = 0.635, P < 0.05). Blood ANGPTL6 was significantly correlated with incident diabetes in participants aged 65 and older (HR = 0.314, P < 0.05), and blood SCG3 was associated with incident diabetes in those with a BMI of <24 kg/m2 (HR = 1.296, P < 0.05). Two subgroup‐specific biomarker strategies were developed. The gender and BMI‐specific biomarker strategy, using traditional risk factors and blood SCG3 or VAP‐1 in different subgroups, could improve prediction performance, especially the specificity and positive prediction value, compared with the whole‐population strategy using only traditional risk factors or traditional risk factors plus blood VAP‐1. Conclusion Gender‐ and BMI‐specific biomarker strategy can improve the prediction of incident diabetes. A subgroup‐specific biomarker strategy is a novel approach in the prediction of incident diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yen et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: