The relationship between hydrophilicity and surface morphology of TiO 2 film was investigated. TiO 2 films were deposited by MOCVD, and anatase films were crystallized. The rougher the surface of anatase film, the slower the conversion from hydrophilic to hydrophobic state. Also in some films, even the sonication could not accelerate the kinetics. However, the recovery rate to hydrophilicity under UV illumination had a reverse dependency on the surface roughness. It was assumed that the rougher TiO 2 films could have a large concentration of Ti 3+ generated by UV illumination on the surface, which plays a major role as adsorption sites of −OH in the water as well as in the air. Therefore, the healing kinetics of Ti 3+ by oxygen in the air of a dark room could have been different among films with various surface roughnesses. Conclusively, the sustaining tendency of hydrophilic or hydrophobic properties could mainly depend on the concentration of Ti 3+ by UV light, and in turn on the processing conditions of film deposition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: