Why the study?
The study was conducted to identify risk factors for cardiovascular disease in breast cancer patients and to assess the performance of the Abdel-Qadir risk prediction model score.
Does the Abdel-Qadir risk prediction model accurately predict cardiovascular events in women with breast cancer?
Does the Abdel-Qadir risk prediction model accurately predict cardiovascular events in women with breast cancer?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Abdel-Qadir risk prediction model for cardiovascular events in breast cancer patients showed suboptimal performance (c-index < 0.7) in a French cohort, suggesting the need for incorporating additional factors like tumor grading.
OBJECTIVES: To identify patients at high risk of developing cardiovascular disease through the identification of risk factors among a large population of breast cancer women and to assess the performance of Abdel-Qadir risk prediction model score. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records and baseline characteristics of all patients/tumors diagnosed with breast cancer from 2010 to 2011 in a French comprehensive cancer center were collected. Cardiovascular events were defined as arterial and cardiac events, atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism occurring during the 5-year follow-up. Abdel-Qadir multivariable prediction model for major adverse cardiovascular events were used with the concordance index (c-index) score to assess calibration by comparing predicted risks to observed probabilities. RESULTS: Among the 943 breast cancer patients included, 83 patients (8.8%) presented with at least one cardiovascular event, leading to a cumulative incidence of 0.07 at 5 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.055-0.088). The cumulative incidence of atrial fibrillation at 5 years was 0.01 (95% CI, 0.005-0.018). Factors associated with the occurrence of cardiovascular events were pre-existing cardiovascular diseases including high blood pressure (hazard ratio [HR]=1.78, 95% CI=1.07-2.97, P=0.028), acute coronary syndrome (HR=5.28, 95% CI: 2.16-12.88, P<0.05) and grade 3 Scarff-Blool-Richardson (HR=1.95, 95% CI: 1.21-3.15, P=0.006). With a c-index inferior to 0.7, the Abdel-Qadir score was not fully validated in our population. CONCLUSION: These findings call for the assessment of the performance of risk prediction models such as Abdel-Qadir score coupled with other factors such as Scarff Bloom and Richardson grading in order to identify patients at high risk of experiencing cardiotoxicity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2022 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: