Why the study?
Oral anticoagulants are commonly used in HFrEF patients with atrial fibrillation, but their role in HFrEF patients with sinus rhythm remains unclear.
Do oral anticoagulants reduce mortality, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, and hospitalization rates in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and sinus rhythm?
Do oral anticoagulants reduce mortality, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, and hospitalization rates in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and sinus rhythm?
In HFrEF patients with sinus rhythm, oral anticoagulants reduce non-fatal strokes and MIs compared to antiplatelets or placebo, but this benefit is offset by an increased risk of major bleeding without improving overall mortality.
Background: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a growing health concern, with an increased risk of thromboembolic events. Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are commonly used in HFrEF patients with atrial fibrillation, but their role in patients with sinus rhythm is unclear. Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of OACs in HFrEF patients with sinus rhythm. Methods: A systematic review of seven studies involving 17 051 patients was conducted. Outcomes included mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), nonfatal stroke, and hospitalization rates. Results: OACs significantly reduced non-fatal strokes compared to antiplatelets and placebo. A measurable reduction in nonfatal MIs was observed in most studies. However, no conclusive benefit was found regarding all-cause fatality and rehospitalization rates. The benefit of OACs in stroke prevention was counterbalanced by an increased risk of major bleeding episodes. Conclusion: OACs may have a role in reducing nonfatal cardiovascular events in HFrEF patients with sinus rhythm, particularly those with ischemic etiologies or underlying thrombotic states. However, further research is needed to establish their efficacy and safety in this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kamal et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: