Why the study?
Hemodynamic changes at rest and during exercise in heart failure after cardiac resynchronization therapy were undefined.
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy improve peak exercise cardiac output and oxygen uptake in heart failure patients?
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy improve peak exercise cardiac output and oxygen uptake in heart failure patients?
CRT improves peak exercise cardiac output and stroke volume in all heart failure patients, suggesting peak cardiac output is a more reliable marker of exercise improvement than peak oxygen uptake.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May favor peak cardiac output over VO2 for CRT exercise assessment; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
Objectives and Background: Hemodynamic changes at rest and during exercise in heart failure (HF) after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are still undefined. Methods: In 93 HF patients, before and 8 ± 3 months after CRT, we assessed clinical conditions, ECG and standard echocardiography and we performed a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test with non-invasive measurement of cardiac output (CO) by inert gas rebreathing method. Results: At rest, CRT shortened QRS and improved NYHA class and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), but not CO and stroke volume (SV). On average, at peak exercise, a significant improvement of oxygen uptake (VO2) (from 13.8 ± 3.8 ml/min/kg to 14.9 ± 4.6, p<0.0025), CO (from 6.19 ± 1.82 L/min to 6.97 ± 2.21, p<0.0001), and SV (from 62 ± 18 mL to 71 ± 19, p<0.0001) were detected. Regardless of HF severity, after CRT, patients showed a significant peak SV and CO increase, but a significant peak VO2 increase was observed only in patients with the lowest pre-CRT peak VO2 (5.9-11.3 ml/kg/min). Conclusions: Our data showed that: a) SV at rest was not affected by CRT, regardless of LVEF improvement; b) post-CRT peak VO2 improvement was limited to HF patients with low pre-CRT peak VO2; c) post-CRT, a similar peak CO increase was observed regardless of pre-CRT peak VO2. Consequently, the assessment of peak CO is preferable to analyze CRT effects on exercise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cattadori et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: