Why the study?
It was unclear which angle is of the greatest hemodynamic benefit during exercise in the recumbent position.
Does recumbent cycling at different angles improve cerebral blood flow velocity and rate pressure product compared to upright cycling in healthy volunteers?
Does recumbent cycling at different angles improve cerebral blood flow velocity and rate pressure product compared to upright cycling in healthy volunteers?
Cycling at a recumbent angle of 15R increases cerebral blood flow velocity and reduces rate pressure product compared to upright cycling in healthy volunteers.
Recumbent cycling may aid cerebral perfusion in healthy adults; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
The cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) and rate pressure product (RPP) have been reported to benefit hemodynamics more during exercise in the recumbent position than during that in the upright position. However, it is unclear which angle is of the greatest benefit to hemodynamics during exercise in the recumbent position. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the recumbent angle on CBFV and RPP during exercise. Methods: In a balanced crossover study, 15 healthy volunteers (age, 18.71.1 years) were asked to perform the bicycle exercise four times in the upright and at recumbent angles of 67 (R), 47R, and 15R, with weekly intervals between each condition. The exercise intensity was set initially at 50 W and increased by 25 W every 2 minutes up to 150 W. CBFV in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) was measured using transcranial doppler sonography. All data were analyzed using two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results: CBFV at 15R was significantly higher than that in the upright position and at 67R at 10 minutes recovery (6916 vs. 567 and 5810 cm/s, respectively; P<0.05). The RPP was significantly lower at 67R, 47R, and 15R than in the upright position immediately after exercise (17623, 17722, and 17326, respectively, vs. 24142 mmHgbeats/min10 -2 ; P<0.001). Conclusions: At an angle of less than 67R, exercise increases CBFV and reduces RPP, relative to those during exercise in the upright position. This hemodynamic effect was most prominent at 15R, where cerebral circulation was further increased in the recovery phase.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: