The transport of the passive tracers 14 CO 2 and SF 6 has been modelled with two versions of the general circulation model ECHAM4 with different vertical resolutions: the standard model with 19 model layers (L19) and a higher-resolution version with 39 layers (L39).We study the impact of vertical resolution on the modelled transport characteristics.Both models are able to capture the observed SF 6 concentrations in the troposphere, but in the stratosphere the SF 6 mixing ratios are overestimated.L39 generally calculates higher stratospheric SF 6 mixing ratios than L19.This deviation increases with altitude.The difference between the modelled profiles is partly attributed to the residual mean meridional circulation, which is stronger in L39 than in L19, and partly to the initial globally constant SF 6 concentration.The comparison of modelled 14 CO 2 surface concentrations and vertical profiles with observations has shown that an increased vertical resolution in the climate model ECHAM4 reduces the strength of stratosphere-troposphere exchange.L39 allows a better representation of sharp gradients at the tropopause than L19.This results in a weaker downward transport across the tropopause.However, compared to observations the downward transport is still too strong even in the L39 simulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Land et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: