A series of Ru(II)−Rh(III) dyads of general formula (ttpy)Ru−tpy−(ph) n −tpy−Rh(ttpy) 5+ with n = 0, 1, 2 [ttpy = 4‘- p -tolyl-2,2‘:6,2‘‘-terpyridine; tpy−(ph) n −tpy = bridging ligand where two 2,2‘:6‘,2‘‘-terpyridine units are connected at the 4‘-position through a variable number of p -phenylene spacers] have been studied, in acetonitrile at room temperature, by picosecond and nanosecond time-resolved emission spectroscopy. When n = 1, excitation of the Ru(II)-based molecular component is followed by efficient intramolecular quenching by electron transfer to the Rh(III) center. The rate constant, k ≥ 3 × 10 9 s - 1, is high despite the relatively small driving force of the process (ca. 0.1 eV). When n = 2, with the same driving force as above, no intramolecular electron transfer quenching is observed (upper limit for the rate constant of the electron transfer process: k < 5 × 10 8 s - 1 ). The decrease in electron transfer rate obtained in going from n = 1 to n = 2 is in line with the behavior of other systems containing poly- p -phenylene spacers. The dyad with n = 0 is definitely not homogeneous with the other two: the intercomponent electronic coupling is much stronger, the Ru(II)-based excited state is lower in energy, and the electron transfer has a smaller driving force (Δ G ≈ 0). The lifetime of the Ru(II)-based emission is 17 ns. The lack of an obvious model compound makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions for this system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Indelli et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: