BACKGROUND: Cyclosporin A (CsA) has been shown to be highly effective in the therapy of atopic dermatitis (AD). However, little information exists on the treatment of AD patients with Sandimmun Neoral(R) (Neoral), a microemulsion of CsA with improved pharmacokinetic properties in comparison to Sandimmun(R). OBJECTIVE: We have compared the efficacy and tolerability of Sandimmun and Neoral. METHODS: In a randomised, monocentric, double-blind, cross-over pilot study (n = 14), each formulation was administered for 8 weeks, followed by switching to the other treatment group for another 8 weeks. RESULTS: After 2 weeks of therapy, the improvement under Neoral therapy was significantly higher than with Sandimmun (disease activity p = 0.047; extent of disease p = 0.016). In contrast, after 8 weeks of therapy, both formulations yielded similar improvement in the patients' condition. CONCLUSION: While both formulations are effective and well tolerated in the treatment of severe AD, Neoral may have a faster onset of action and higher initial efficacy, which makes it an adequate replacement for Sandimmun.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zurbriggen et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: