Why the study?
Does a community-based physical activity program improve self-reported knowledge of physical activity benefits, attempts to increase exercise, or prevalence of physical inactivity in community residents?
Does a community-based physical activity program improve self-reported knowledge of physical activity benefits, attempts to increase exercise, or prevalence of physical inactivity in community residents?
A community-based physical activity program in Pawtucket, RI did not significantly improve physical activity knowledge, attempts to exercise, or inactivity prevalence compared to a control community over 7 years.
No differences observed; leaves open whether refined community programs affect physical activity behaviors.
OBJECTIVES: The effect of a community-based physical activity program in Pawtucket, RI, was evaluated relative to one in a comparison community. METHODS: Cross-sectional surveys of 7529 residents of Pawtucket, RI, and 7732 residents of the comparison city were conducted at 2-year intervals during 7 years of intervention. RESULTS: There were no differences in self-reported knowledge of the benefits of physical activity, attempts to increase exercise, or prevalence of physical inactivity between Pawtucket and the comparison community. CONCLUSIONS: Future community-based physical activity interventions should attempt to involve a wider range of individuals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eaton et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: