Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Summary: Studies were conducled to cstmiate the adsorption parameter k and the bioactivity (in terms of G R50) of di‐allate [S‐2,3‐dichloroallyl N, N‐di‐isopropyl (thiocar bamate)], iri‐allate [S‐2,3,3‐trichloroallyl N, N ‐di‐isopropyl (thiocar bamate], and [trifiuralin (2,6‐dinitro N, N‐dlpropyl‐4‐trifluoromelhylaniline) in a number of Saskatchewan soil. The k values ratiged from 5 for di‐allate adsorption m Asquilh loamy sand to 315 for trifluralin adsorption on Melfort loam and were closely related to the soil organic matter content. The relative degree of adsorption was irifluralin > tri‐allate >di‐allaie. For each herbicide, the G R50 values were positively correlated wich organic matter conienl atid wilh k. It was suggested that these nonionic herbicides may be amenable to a predictive approach for field application rates in different soils. Among herbicides for any one soil, however, there was not the same relationship between G R50andk. since the G R50 was least for trifluralin and there was no significant difference between di‐allate and tri‐allate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grover et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: