The position that a composite error score is not an interpretable indicator of motor performance is supported and expanded. It is shown that Henry's E(2) statistic possesses the same deficiencies as A (2), and thus is equally invalid. Responses are made to a number of specific criticisms of the Schutz and Roy paper made by Henry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robert W. Schutz (1974) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: