Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Sciences originated from seeking the solutions to some fundamental questions about the universe and life. Earlier application of a holistic approach led to the first peak when some of the unfalsifiable theories such as Buddhism and Daoism were developed while introduction of a reductionist approach led to the born of Newtonian mechanics. After that sciences developed in a very fast speed but in a divergent way and many conflicts or paradoxes exist among different scientific theories. How to establish a logically consistent theory for everything is a target for some scientists and currently several versions of theory of everything (TOE) are available. In this paper, a new version of TOE is proposed, and the basic idea of this TOE is that the theoretical framework of Bertalanffy's general system theory is borrowed but its materialist philosophy is replaced by Buddhist philosophy. Based on six axioms, a general uncertainty principle is derived which can explain all the phenomena we observed. Of course, the validity of the TOE is subjected to more strict examination by other scientists.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weicheng Cui (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: