Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate in vitro the effect of the inhibition of endogenous dentinal enzymes (matrix metalloproteinases-MMPs and cysteine cathepsins-CCs) on dentine erosion. DESIGN: Dentine blocks (4mm×4mm×2mm) from sound human teeth were randomly divided into 7 groups (n=17) according to the treatment: MMP- and CC-inhibitor chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX, 10mM); MMP-inhibitor galardin (G, 0.2mM); specific cathepsin B inhibitor (CCB, 0.2mM); non-specific CC inhibitor (CCE-64, 0.5μM); fluoride (F, 1.23% NaF); placebo (P) and untreated (UT). Inhibitors were applied as gels once for 1min. Specimens were submitted to 5 days of pH cycling including the erosive challenge (Coke, pH 2.64, 90s/day) and remineralisation (artificial saliva). Demineralised organic surface loss was determined profilometrically. Demineralised organic matrix (DOM) was removed with collagenase and the profile was re-evaluated in the absence of collagen fibrils. The differences in profilometric results and DOM thickness among the groups were analysed with ANOVA and Tukey's test (p<0.05). RESULTS: Loss of demineralised tissue (μm, mean±SD) was: CHX 8.4±1.7 b, G 8.6±1.9 b, CCB 9.6±1.4 a, CCE-64 9.9±1.3 a, F 9.9±1.7 a, P 10.9±2.2 a, UT 11.0±1.5 a. Loss of mineralised tissue was: CHX 15.4±2.2 b, G 16.0±1.8 b, CCB 17.6±2.4 a, CCE-64 17.6±2.0 a, F 17.3±2.8 a, P 19.1±2.1 a, UT 18.9±2.4 a. MMP-inhibitors significantly reduced organic matrix and mineral loss in comparison to all the other groups (p<0.05). No statistically significant differences were found in the thickness of the remaining DOM (p=0.845). CONCLUSION: Dentine endogenous MMPs seem to be the main enzymes responsible for DOM loss and erosion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zarella et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: