Automatic modulation recognition is advantageous for wireless communication systems employing adaptive modulation, software-defined radio, and cognitive radio. In this paper, we consider a phase based maximum likelihood (ML) approach for identifying the modulation format of a linearly modulated signal. Since the optimal ML scheme is computationally intensive, we propose two approximate ML alternatives, which can offer close-to-optimal performance with reduced complexity. We then present a general performance analysis for classification of K types of modulation constellations. For K;5, we obtain a set of upper bounds on Pcc, which provide a tradeoff between accuracy and complexity in calculating the Pcc. In addition, asymptotic behavior of phase based ML classification schemes is investigated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: