Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Editorial
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Clinical handoff failures in low-resource settings are driven by systemic and structural limitations rather than just insufficient implementation of structured communication tools like SBAR.
Medical and academic nursing have employed significant use of situation, background, assessment, and recommendation (SBAR). It is a standardized, effective, and recognized communication tool that promotes clear communication in a short time and is easily implemented in hospital-based procedures for information sharing among healthcare providers [1]. However, in low-resource settings (LRS), the handoff challenges arise not only from incorrect use of SBAR itself but from deeper systemic and structural limitations that hinder patient safety. These fundamentals include a lack of reliable help-seeking mechanisms, irregular or insufficient training, and the absence of standardized communication practices. Without these foundational systems, the efficacy of even well-equipped SBAR systems is significantly impaired. This manuscript aims to highlight that clinical handoff failures in low-resource healthcare situations are caused by intersecting structural, cultural, educational, and technological issues, rather than insufficient SBAR implementation alone. It advocates for context-sensitive adaptation and supportive mechanisms to ensure that structured communication tools like SBAR are genuinely effective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Farhan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: