Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional images of multicore fibers include an arbitrary rotational offset, making core-position errors dependent on the reference-angle definition. This dependence is practically important when specifications or standards impose upper limits, because heavy-tailed definitions can reduce apparent inspection yield through conservative pass/fail decisions. We formulate reference-angle determination as norm minimization after translation to the cladding-center origin, and compare four criteria: L 1 , L 2 , L 4 , and L ∞ , which respectively minimize the sum, sum of squares, sum of fourth powers, and maximum of the per-core deviations. Monte Carlo simulations with Gaussian fabrication perturbations and center-localization noise show that L 1 gives the smallest mean but the heaviest upper tail, while L ∞ suppresses extremes but is noise-sensitive. Among the examined criteria, L 4 provides the best balance, combining L ∞ -like tail suppression with L 2 -like robustness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hayashi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: