Functional morphology asks how animal structures work and whether observed structures are superior to possible alternatives. Ecological morphology examines the structures of different animals in relation to their various environments and ways of life. Some studies in both fields are concerned mainly with topography, but most make use of at least one of the branches of physics and engineering: examples involving kinematics, dynamics, fluid mechanics, acoustics, optics, heat exchange and diffusion are presented, together with some of the important experimental methods. Whichever branches of physics are used, allometry, optimization and the study of symmorphoses are likely to be illuminating. Functional and ecological morphologists should be more aware of evolutionary theory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
R. McN. Alexander (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: