Why the study?
To evaluate reducing severe hypertriglyceridaemia and episodes of pancreatitis with volanesorsen in familial chylomicronemia syndrome unresponsive to diet and triglyceride-lowering treatment.
Does volanesorsen reduce triglycerides in a patient with familial chylomicronemia syndrome?
Does volanesorsen reduce triglycerides in a patient with familial chylomicronemia syndrome?
Volanesorsen effectively reduced triglycerides by >25% without causing thrombocytopenia in a patient with severe familial chylomicronemia syndrome and recurrent pancreatitis.
Objective: To reduce severe hypertriglyceridaemia and episodes of pancreatitis in patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCHS), in whom the response to diet and triglyceride (TG) lowering treatment has not been sufficient. Method: A 46-year-old woman diagnosed with genetically confirmed FFCS, with heterozygous presence of two variants and very severe elevation of triglycerides (≥2000 mg/dL), multiple admissions for acute pancreatitis since the age of 19, with associated side effects such as pancreatoprive Diabetes Mellitus with need for insulin and severe hepatic steatosis with grade I fibrosis diagnosed by liver biopsy. Given the intolerance to fibrates and insufficient response to diet and high doses of ω-3 fatty acids, we started treatment with Volanesorsen. Result: After 6 admissions for acute pancreatitis from January to April 2020, treatment with Volanesorsen was started on 7 August. Platelets at the start of treatment were 283x103/mm3 and triglycerides 1878 mg/dL. Platelet monitoring was performed every 2 weeks and at all times the figure remained >140x103/mm3. The treatment was well tolerated and after three months, the targets for continuing Volanesorsen were reached, reducing TG by more than 25% and reaching 624 mg/dL with platelets in the normal range. Conclusion: Volanesorsen is indicated as an adjunct to diet in adult patients with genetically confirmed FQS at high risk of pancreatitis, in whom the response to diet and triglyceride-lowering treatment has not been sufficient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
BARROS et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: