Why the study?
In dermatomyositis, inflammation, reduced activity, and medication adversely affect the musculoskeletal system, but the endocrine factors regulating myogenesis, bone metabolism, and their associations with physical function remain to be clarified.
Biochemical musculo-skeletal markers are altered and physical function shows deficits in dermatomyositis patients.
Suggests musculoskeletal biomarker profiling may help characterize functional deficits in dermatomyositis; leaves open whether targeting.
Background: In dermatomyostis (DM) patients, inflammation, reduced activity, and medication have a negative impact on the musculoskeletal system. Several endocrine factors are involved in muscle growth and bone turnover.Objective: We aimed to investigate factors regulating myogenesis and bone metabolism and to evaluate possible associations between these endocrine factors, muscle strength, and functional tests in DM patients.Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study in 20 dermatomyositis patients. Serum levels of myostatin (MSTN), follistatin (FSTN), dickkopf 1 (Dkk1), sclerostin (SOST), periostin (PSTN), the receptor activator nuclear factor kB ligand (RANKL):osteoprotegerin (OPG) ratio and fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) were determined. Physical function was evaluated by hand-held strength measurement, chair rising test, timed up and go test and the 3-minute walking test. Results: Serum MSTN and FGF23 levels (2.5 [1.9; 3.2] vs. 1.9 [1.6; 2.3] and 2.17 [1.45; 3.26] vs. 1.28 [0.79; 1.96], respectively; p<0.05) were significantly higher in DM patients than in controls. Dkk1 was significantly lower (11.4 [6.9; 20.0] vs. 31.8 [14.3; 50.6], p<0.01). Muscle strength and physical function tests correlated with each other (e.g. hip flexion – timed up and go test: r=-0.748, p<0.01).Conclusion: In DM patients, biochemical musculo-skeletal markers are altered and physical function shows deficits. All these tests reflect independent of each other different deficits in long-term DM patients which is important for the assessment of DM patients as well as planning of therapeutic interventions in clinical routine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kerschan‐Schindl et al. (2020) studied this question.