In Spring 2016 the University of York launched a research project to better understand academic staff. Ambitiously titled ‘Understanding Academics’ the project centred around the use of specific ethnographic methodologies and in particular two UX techniques: cognitive mapping followed by semi-structured interviews. The use of UX methodologies put the academics at the centre of the interviews, focussing on what they wanted to talk about rather than working through a pre-determined set of questions. Following the interviews, a five-stage methodology for managing and analysing the research data was developed. Ultimately, the research has led to a number of key outcomes: a set of ‘quick wins’; a set of longer-term practical recommendations; an evidence-based synthesis which seeks to define and explain academic life and understand the key motivations, frustrations and aspirations for academics; and finally an analysis of the key themes from the interview data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blake et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: