Key result
Dual-switching monopolar radiofrequency ablation created a significantly larger coagulation volume than single-switching monopolar ablation (40.4 vs 20.8 cm3; p < 0.001) in an in vivo swine liver model.
Why the study?
Does dual-switching monopolar radiofrequency ablation using a separable clustered electrode improve coagulation volume compared to single-switching monopolar radiofrequency ablation in an in vivo porcine liver model?
Does dual-switching monopolar radiofrequency ablation using a separable clustered electrode improve coagulation volume compared to single-switching monopolar radiofrequency ablation in an in vivo porcine liver model?
Absolute Event Rate: 40.4% vs 20.8%
p-value: p=< 0.001
Dual-switching monopolar radiofrequency ablation using a separable clustered electrode is feasible and creates significantly larger ablation zones than single-switching monopolar RFA in an in vivo porcine liver model.
May enable larger ablation zones clinically if confirmed; leaves open translation from this swine model to human outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the in vivo efficiency of monopolar radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using a dual-switching (DS) system and a separable clustered (SC) electrode to create coagulation in swine liver. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three ablation zones were created in nine pigs using a DS system and an SC electrode in the switching monopolar mode. The pigs were divided into two groups for two experiments: 1) preliminary experiments (n = 3) to identify the optimal inter-electrode distances (IEDs) for dual-switching monopolar (DSM)-RFA, and 2) main experiments (n = 6) to compare the in vivo efficiency of DSM-RFA with that of a single-switching monopolar (SSM)-RFA. RF energy was alternatively applied to one of the three electrodes (SSM-RFA) or concurrently applied to a pair of electrodes (DSM-RFA) for 12 minutes in in vivo porcine livers. The delivered RFA energy and the shapes and dimensions of the coagulation areas were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: No pig died during RFA. The ideal IEDs for creating round or oval coagulation area using the DSM-RFA were 2.0 and 2.5 cm. DSM-RFA allowed more efficient RF energy delivery than SSM-RFA at the given time (23.0 ± 4.0 kcal vs. 16.92 ± 2.0 kcal, respectively; p = 0.0005). DSM-RFA created a significantly larger coagulation volume than SSM-RFA (40.4 ± 16.4 cm(3) vs. 20.8 ± 10.7 cm(3); p < 0.001). Both groups showed similar circularity of the ablation zones (p = 0.29). CONCLUSION: Dual-switching monopolar-radiofrequency ablation using an SC electrode is feasible and can create larger ablation zones than SSM-RFA as it allows more RF energy delivery at a given time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoon et al. (2014) studied Swine liver (experimental model) (n=9). Dual-switching monopolar radiofrequency ablation (DSM-RFA) vs. Single-switching monopolar radiofrequency ablation (SSM-RFA) was evaluated on Coagulation volume (p=< 0.001). Dual-switching monopolar radiofrequency ablation created a significantly larger coagulation volume than single-switching monopolar ablation (40.4 vs 20.8 cm3; p < 0.001) in an in vivo swine liver model.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: