The studies of this series were extended to the negative ions of m⁄e 26 and 42 obtained from nitroalkanes; nitromethane, nitroethane, 1-nitropropane, and 2-nitropropane. For m⁄e 26 (probably, CN−) ions, the contribution of three or two processes in the range from zero to ∼20 eV of electron energy was observed for nitromethane or other samples. On the basis of ΔHf values of the reactants and products, and of the value of EA(CN), the plausible reactions to be assigned to each process were presented. For the first process, CH3NO2+e−→CN−+H2O+OH, RNO2+e−→CN−+R1OH+OH. For the second process, CH3NO2+e−→CN−+H2O+O+H, CH3NO2+e−→CN−+H2+O2+H, RNO2+e−→CN−+R1+HO2+H, and C3H7NO2+e→CN−+C2H4+H2+O+OH irrespective of kind of nitropropane. For the third process, CH3NO2+e−→CN−+3H+O2. For m⁄e 42 (probably, CNO−) ions, the contribution of two processes was observed. By taking ΔHf (CNO)=x (eV), EA(CNO)=y (eV), and also combining the observed onset values with the calculated values of appearance potential of reactions to be assigned for each process — for the first process, CH3NO2+e→CNO−+H2+OH, RNO2+e−→CNO−+R1OH+H; for the second process, CH3NO2+e−→CNO−+HO+2H, CH3NO2+e−→CNO−+H2+O+H, RNO2+e−→CNO−+R1O+2H– a relation of x−y2(eV) was derived.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsuda et al. (1969) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: