Key result
Case studies from Duke and Colorado provide practical solutions for aligning clinical redesign in congestive heart failure care with alternative payment models like bundled payments and shared savings.
Case Report
Yes
The paper explores how two large academic centers successfully aligned clinical redesign in heart failure care with alternative payment models.
May inform local heart failure redesign under value-based payments; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before broader adoption.
To help support implementation of aligning clinical redesign with payment reforms in practices and institutions throughout the country, we present two cases from Duke University Health System ("Duke") and University of Colorado Hospital ("Colorado"). The studies provide practical solutions for not only implementing clinical redesign, but also an understanding of how those clinical innovations can be aligned with alternative payment models. The cases will explore the following questions: What challenges or problems encouraged the organization to redesign CHF care? How did the organization select and then align care innovations with payment reforms, including bundled payments and shared savings? What did the organization identify as key success factors and/or challenges? How did these changes impact the organization׳s clinical outcomes or financial position? Finally, what lessons would the organization share with others attempting to implement similar strategies?
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
George et al. (2014) conducted a case report in Congestive heart failure. Clinical redesign aligned with payment reforms was evaluated. Case studies from Duke and Colorado provide practical solutions for aligning clinical redesign in congestive heart failure care with alternative payment models like bundled payments and shared savings.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: