PURPOSE: To compare the incidence and intensity of posterior capsular opacification (PCO) and neodymium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Nd:YAG) capsulotomy rates between two microincision intra-ocular lenses (IOLs) 3 years after surgery. METHODS: Sixty-five patients randomly received a Y-60H IOL (HOYA Surgical Optics, Singapore) in one eye and a Micro AY IOL (PhysIOL, Liège, Belgium) in the contralateral eye during same-day bilateral cataract surgery. Eyes were examined 1 week, 20 months and 3 years after surgery. The amount of PCO (score: 0-10) was assessed subjectively at the slit lamp and objectively using automated image analysis software (aqua). Additionally, the Nd:YAG capsulotomy rate was noted. RESULTS: Three years postoperatively, the objective PCO score of Y-60H IOLs was 1.9 ± 1.7 compared to PCO score of 1.7 ± 2.2 for the Micro AY IOLs (p = 0.66). Thirty-four percentage of the Y-60H eyes had undergone Nd:YAG capsulotomy, compared to 49% of the Micro AY eyes (p = 0.04). Significantly, more capsular folds were observed in the Y-60H IOL group (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in best-corrected visual acuity, rhexis/IOL overlap and anterior capsule opacification 3 years after surgery. CONCLUSION: Both microincision IOLs showed high YAG rates and comparable PCO scores 3 years after surgery. In the light of this unsatisfying PCO performance, the advantage of the present microincision IOLs over conventional IOLs must be questioned.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schriefl et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: