Key result
Elevated copeptin aids stroke diagnosis and exclusion of mimics, but subtype differentiation evidence remains mixed.
Why the study?
Does copeptin measurement help in diagnosing and differentiating stroke subtypes and stroke mimics in acute neurological patients?
Systematic Review
Does copeptin measurement help in diagnosing and differentiating stroke subtypes and stroke mimics in acute neurological patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Copeptin is a promising blood biomarker that may assist clinicians in diagnosing stroke and differentiating it from stroke mimics in the acute setting.
Diagnosis in stroke patients is based mainly on clinical and radiological findings; therefore, there is a need for serological markers that can orient the clinician. Copeptin is a new blood marker for diagnosis and prognosis in several neurological conditions, such as ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, and multiple sclerosis. The aim of our study was to highlight the diagnostic value of copeptin in differentiating between stroke subtypes and stroke mimics. We performed a literature review by searching the PubMed and Scopus databases for papers with the following keywords: "stroke AND copeptin AND differential". The PRISMA criteria were used. We identified 29 papers that met the criteria. We analyzed only original research articles, excluding reviews and only including those in English. Some studies did not find any significant differences between cerebral infarction, intracerebral hemorrhage, and subarachnoid hemorrhage, but one study demonstrated significant correlations. All studies agreed that copeptin levels can help in differentiating stroke patients from stroke-free patients. Copeptin levels were correlated with prognostic scales For stroke mimics, copeptin levels were extremely broad and for vestibular disorders; it was shown that a normal level of copeptin excludes stroke. Copeptin is a new blood marker that can help clinicians in the acute neurological field. It may help in diagnosing stroke, in differentiating between stroke subtypes and stroke mimics, and in evaluating the prognosis of these patients, but further studies are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vasile et al. (2025) conducted a systematic review in Stroke. Copeptin vs. Stroke-free patients and stroke mimics was evaluated on Differentiating between stroke subtypes and stroke mimics. Copeptin levels can help differentiate stroke patients from stroke-free patients and exclude stroke in vestibular disorders, though evidence for differentiating stroke subtypes is mixed.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: