Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Recently, statistical models for the identification of word senses in English text have been suggested, such as Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA), which is based on dimensionality reduction. While this approach has yielded promising results, it makes many assumptions about the underlying semantic structure. In this paper, the goal is to use cluster analysis to group word senses objectively on the basis of their co-occurrence with other words. This method does not make any a priori assumptions about the group to which a case might be assigned: It is an arbitrary classification made on the basis of a specific number of a group, which are then classified on the basis of their metric distance from one another in a high-dimensional space. The results of classifying two senses of the word BANK indicate high classification accuracy for primary word senses, but poor classification accuracy for secondary word senses. A role for using cluster analysis to determine highly discriminating items in text is discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paul Watters (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: