Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 10, 2014Critical CareOpen Access

The effect of continuous versus intermittent renal replacement therapy on the outcome of critically ill patients with acute renal failure (CONVINT): a prospective randomized controlled trial

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

JSJoerg C. SchefoldSHStephan von HaehlingRPRené Pschowski

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Schefold et al. (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8dcdf7744d533c407dcbb4https://doi.org/10.1186/cc13188
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1KDIGO Clinical Practice Guidelines for Acute Kidney Injury2012 · 8,249 citations
  2. 2Sustained low efficiency dialysis using a single-pass batch system in acute kidney injury - a randomized interventional trial: the REnal Replacement Therapy Study in Intensive Care Unit PatiEnts2012 · 161 citations
  3. 3Septic AKI in ICU patients. diagnosis, pathophysiology, and treatment type, dosing, and timing: a comprehensive review of recent and future developments2011 · 92 citations
  4. 4APACHE II1985 · 13,862 citations
  5. 5Comparison of continuous and intermittent renal replacement therapy for acute renal failure2005 · 343 citations