Key result
The PRISM-CC demonstrated negligible differential item functioning and differential test functioning across age, gender, education level, number of health conditions, and between English and Swedish versions.
Why the study?
This study was conducted to assess the comparability of the Patient Reported Inventory of Self-Management of Chronic Conditions across sociodemographic groups, number of health conditions, and language.
Cross-Sectional (n=1,571)
The PRISM-CC is a valid tool for assessing self-management ease and difficulty across different demographic groups and in both English and Swedish languages without meaningful measurement bias.
Supports the cross-cultural and demographic reliability of this patient-reported outcome tool; extends its.
PURPOSE: Developed simultaneously in English and Swedish, the Patient Reported Inventory of Self-Management of Chronic Conditions (PRISM-CC) assesses patients’ perceived difficulty managing life with long-term health conditions. This study assessed the comparability of the PRISM-CC across sociodemographic groups, number of health conditions and language (English and Swedish). METHODS: Differential item functioning (DIF) and differential test functioning (DTF) were analysed by age, gender, education level, and number of conditions using independent English and Swedish datasets. Language-based DIF and DTF were examined using pooled data. An iterative hybrid ordinal logistic regression approach was applied to identify potential DIF across the PRISM-CC’s seven domains. The impact of flagged items on total scores (DTF) was evaluated by comparing test characteristic curves. RESULTS: Few items were flagged for potential DIF in the English, Swedish or pooled data, and only at low cutoff values. The impact of items with potential DIF on DTF was negligible. CONCLUSION: The absence of meaningful DIF and DTF in either the English or Swedish version of the PRISM-CC or between English and Swedish versions provides further support for the PRISM-CC as a valuable tool for assessing self-management ease and difficulty. These results also demonstrate the value of simultaneous development of instruments in two languages. Further evaluation of DIF is necessary in populations with greater self-management challenges, such as among people with severe disease burden.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olsson et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Long-term health conditions (n=1,571). PRISM-CC questionnaire was evaluated on Differential item functioning (DIF) and differential test functioning (DTF). The PRISM-CC demonstrated negligible differential item functioning and differential test functioning across age, gender, education level, number of health conditions, and between English and Swedish versions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: