Key result
A Framingham risk score of 10% or greater was strongly associated with missed opportunities to intervene prior to hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction (OR 19.5; 95% CI 9.3-40.6).
Why the study?
Do coronary risk prediction tools help identify missed opportunities for early intervention in primary care patients presenting with acute cardiac ischemia symptoms?
Case-Control (n=424)
Yes
Do coronary risk prediction tools help identify missed opportunities for early intervention in primary care patients presenting with acute cardiac ischemia symptoms?
Coronary risk prediction tools, particularly a Framingham risk score ≥10%, can help primary care clinicians identify patients with acute cardiac ischemia symptoms who require more intensive evaluation to prevent missed opportunities prior to MI hospitalization.
BACKGROUND: The role of primary care clinicians (physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants) in evaluating acute cardiac ischemia is not well documented in office-based settings. Decision aids developed in the emergency department and other settings may help identify missed opportunities to intervene in symptomatic outpatients before hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study of patients with no history of heart disease in a multisite group practice. Cases ("missed opportunities") were outpatients evaluated by primary care clinicians for chest pain or other anginal equivalents within 30 days of hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction and not referred for immediate hospital care (n = 106). We identified 3 control patients matched to each case (n = 318) using initial symptom and encounter date. We assessed the ability of several coronary risk prediction tools to identify missed opportunities. RESULTS: We identified 966 acute myocardial infarction hospital admissions among nearly 250,000 adults, including 261 (27.0%) with qualifying office visits in the preceding 30 days and 106 (11.0%) who were not directly referred for hospital care (cases). Chest pain (50.0%) and dyspnea (26.4%) were present in most of these cases. A Framingham risk score of 10% or greater was associated with missed opportunities (odds ratio, 19.5; 95% confidence interval, 9.3-40.6). Increased scores using the Diamond and Forrester probability and the Goldman prediction tool were also associated with missed opportunities. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care clinicians play an important role in the management of acute cardiac ischemia. The Framingham risk score can help identify missed opportunities that warrant more intensive evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas D. Sequist (2006) conducted a case-control in Acute cardiac ischemia / Acute myocardial infarction (n=424). Framingham risk score ≥10% was evaluated on Missed opportunities (not referred for immediate hospital care) (OR 19.5, 95% CI 9.3-40.6). A Framingham risk score of 10% or greater was strongly associated with missed opportunities to intervene prior to hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction (OR 19.5; 95% CI 9.3-40.6).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: