BACKGROUND: The authors sought to assess the safety and early efficacy of the pCONUS Bifurcation Aneurysm Implants in a meaningful number of patients; we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis for the treatment of 203 intracranial aneurysms. METHODS: A literature search was performed by a reference librarian, and after screening nine case series were included in this analysis. We estimated from each study the cumulative incidence (event rate) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each outcome. Event rates were pooled in a meta-analysis across studies using the random-effects model; descriptive statistics were reported when relevant. RESULTS: The pCONUS devices can be used with a technical success rate of 100% (95% CI: 0.98-1.00) and a technical complication rate of 0% (95% CI: 0.00-0.02). Perioperative morbidity and mortality rates were 7% (95% CI: 0.03-0.11) and 0% (95% CI: 0.00-0.01), respectively. Perioperative hemorrhage rate was 0% (95% CI: 0.00-0.02); rate of treatment-related long-term neurological deficit was 2% (95% CI: 0.00-0.06). The long-term complete occlusion rate was 60% (95% CI: 0.52-0.69) and retreatment rate was 14% (95% CI: 0.06-0.22). CONCLUSIONS: The pCONUS devices are an additional tool for the treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms with high rates of technical success and sufficiently low rates of morbidity and mortality. Comparative studies with longer-term follow-up are needed to clarify the role of this device in the management of challenging aneurysms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lanzino et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: