This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Hydraulic structures like dams, weirs, and culverts disrupt river connectivity, threatening aquatic biodiversity by impeding fish migration. This study evaluates the hydraulic performance of one-sided wart-type baffles in a diversion tunnel under supercritical flow, focusing on their impact on velocity, turbulence intensity (TI), and low-velocity refuges for fish passage. Experiments were conducted in a 7.0 m tilting flume at Kyoto University, with a 2% bed slope and 0.20 m baffle spacing. Baffles reduced velocities by 10–20% compared to smooth channels, creating heterogeneous flow fields and resting zones critical for fish. Mean TI increased from 7.59% (smooth) to 10.34% (baffled), indicating enhanced turbulence and energy dissipation. The Hydraulic Passage Index showed higher velocity deficits (9.57% vs. 7.94%), reflecting reduced flow efficiency but improved ecological functionality. These findings highlight baffles’ effectiveness in facilitating fish passage, offering insights for optimizing fishway designs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anzani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: