This paper analyses the concept of empirical ethics as well as three meta-ethical fallacies that empirical ethics is said to face: the is-ought problem, the naturalistic fallacy and violation of the fact-value distinction. Moreover, it answers the question of whether empirical ethics (necessarily) commits these three basic meta-ethical fallacies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vries et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: