Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This case review illustrates the important contributions of forensic archeological methods and forensic anthropological analysis to the identification of found skeletal remains. After reassociation of skeletal remains found in two locations, anthropological analysis provided the basis for a presumptive identification and a request for antemortem medical records. Partial DNA profiles were supportive but not conclusive and antemortem dental records were not available. Comparison of antemortem traumas, skeletal morphology, and surgical artifacts with antemortem radiographs and surgical records led to positive identification of an individual missing for almost a decade.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scott et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: