Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: COX-2 inhibitors have shown promise in chemoprevention of epithelial tumors. eIF4E is a biomarker that has identified individuals at high risk for relapse after definitive treatment for head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC). Hence, the authors wanted to determine if COX-2 is expressed in dysplasia of the head and neck and to study the correlation of expression of COX-2 with eIF4E as a potential surrogate endpoint for determining response to COX-2 inhibitors. METHODS: The authors studied the expression of COX-2 and eIF4E in normal epithelium (n = 8), dysplasia (n = 51), mucosa adjacent to tumors (n = 11), and cancer of the head and neck (n = 19) using immunohistochemistry. In addition, Western blot analysis was performed on a subset of the above patient samples and HNSCC cell lines. RESULTS: Immunohistochemical analysis showed expression of COX-2 and eIF4E in all cancers and no expression in normal tissues. In dysplastic epithelium, there was a significant correlation between the expression of eIF4E and COX-2 for all groups of dysplasia combined (chi-square = 40.3, P < 0.001). A Cochran-Armitage trend test showed a significant increase in the proportion of cases that expressed both molecular markers with increasing grades of dysplasia (P = 0.001). Western blot analysis showed increased expression of COX-2 and eIF4E in tumors compared with adjacent mucosa. All three HNSCC cell lines analyzed had increased expression of eIF4E, although only two had increased COX-2 expression. CONCLUSIONS: Expression of COX-2 in dysplasia suggested that COX-2 inhibitors may play a role in chemoprevention of head and neck cancers and that the correlation of Cox-2 with eIF4E indicates that eIF4E can be a potential surrogate marker in chemoprevention trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nathan et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: