Why the study?
Does reverse Trendelenburg position with or without inguinal compression increase femoral vein cross-sectional area in paediatric patients?
Does reverse Trendelenburg position with or without inguinal compression increase femoral vein cross-sectional area in paediatric patients?
Inguinal compression combined with the reverse Trendelenburg position significantly increases femoral vein cross-sectional area, which may facilitate venous access in pediatric patients.
May facilitate pediatric femoral access; leaves open confirmation of improved cannulation success in prospective trials.
This study evaluated the effects of the reverse Trendelenburg position and additional inguinal compression on the cross-sectional area of the femoral vein in paediatric patients. Seventy subjects were allocated to two groups: the infants group and the children group. Cross-sectional area of the femoral vein was measured just below the inguinal ligament using ultrasound. Three measurements were obtained for each patient: (i) supine, (ii) reverse Trendelenburg position and (iii) reverse Trendelenburg position with inguinal compression. In the infants group, femoral vein cross-sectional area increased by a mean (SD) of 21.1 (15.2) % in the reverse Trendelenburg position and by 60.7 (30.8) % in the reverse Trendelenburg position with inguinal compression; whereas in the children group, femoral vein cross-sectional area increased by 24.7 (15.8) % in the reverse Trendelenburg position and by 100.3 (50.7) % in the reverse Trendelenburg position with inguinal compression. Inguinal compression in the reverse Trendelenburg position offers a useful means of increasing femoral vein cross-sectional area in paediatric patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suk et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: