Development of Solid SEDDS, IV: Effect of Adsorbed Lipid and Surfactant on Tableting Properties and Surface Structures of Different Silicates

PURPOSE: To compare six commonly available silicates for their suitability to develop tablets by adsorbing components of liquid lipid-based drug delivery systems. METHODS: The tabletability of Aerosil® 200, Sipernat® 22, Sylysia® 350, Zeopharm® 600, Neusilin® US2 and Neusilin® UFL2 were studied by compressing each silicate into tablets in the presence of 20% microcrystalline cellulose and measuring the tensile strength of tablets produced. Three components of lipid based formulations, namely, Capmul® MCM EP (glycerol monocaprylocaprate), Captex® 355 EP/NF (caprylic/capric triglycerides) and Cremophor® EL (PEG-35 castor oil), were adsorbed individually onto the silicates at 1:1 w/w, and the mixtures were then compressed into tablets. The SEM photomicrographs of neat silicates and their 1:1 w/w mixtures (also 1:2 and 1:3 for Neusilin® US2 and Neusilin® UFL2) with one of the liquids (Cremophor® EL) were recorded. RESULTS: Neat Aerosil® 200, Sipernat® 22 and Sylysia® 350 were non-tabletable to the minimum acceptable tensile strength of 1 MPa, and they were also non-tabletable in presence of liquid. While Zeopharm® 600, Neusilin® US2 and Neusilin® UFL2 were tabletable without the addition of liquids, only Neusilin® US2 retained acceptable tabletability with 1:1 liquid. The SEM images of silicate-liquid mixtures indicated that, except for Neusilin® US2, much of the adsorbed liquid distributed primarily at the surface of particles rather than inside pores, which hindered their compaction into tablets. CONCLUSION: Among the six silicates studied, Neusilin® US2 was the only silicate able to produce tablets with acceptable tensile strength in presence of a lipid component at 1:1 w/w ratio due to the fact that the liquid was mostly adsorbed into the pores of the silicate rather than at the surface.