Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study reveals composition-dependent tensile and peel performance in titanium-carbon fiber laminates, indicating tunable stiffness and toughness via hybrid nanofiller ratios.
This study examines composition-dependent interfacial modification of Ti6Al4V/carbon-fibre metal laminates using TiO2–Si3N4 nanofilled epoxy adhesives. A fixed 3/2 Ti/C/Ti/C/Ti architecture was fabricated with neat epoxy, single-filler TiO2 and Si3N4 systems, and three hybrid filler ratios. Tensile behaviour was evaluated according to ASTM D3039/D3039M-17. An interface-sensitive peel test was also performed to determine the peak peel load and peak peel strength of each adhesive composition. SEM–EDS examination was used for qualitative assessment of the as-fabricated interfaces and tensile-fracture morphologies. The balanced TC-H50 laminate achieved the highest ultimate tensile strength of 684 ± 13 MPa. The TiO2-dominant TC-H60T system produced the highest tensile modulus and proportional-limit strength of 79.1 ± 1.4 GPa and 488 ± 10 MPa, respectively. In contrast, the Si3N4-dominant TC-H60S laminate showed the highest elongation and tensile toughness of 2.95 ± 0.19% and 14.1 ± 0.8 MJ/m3. TC-H60S also showed the highest peak peel load and peak peel strength of 260.0 ± 22.3 N and 10.40 ± 0.89 N/mm, respectively. The combined results indicated composition-dependent differences in laminate stiffness, tensile deformation, and resistance to peel initiation. TiO2-rich systems showed a predominantly stiffness-oriented tensile response, whereas the Si3N4-dominant TC-H60S system showed the highest tensile toughness and peak peel strength.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramasamy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: