Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A case series and systematic review reveals a 21.2% recurrence rate for papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential, highlighting the need for risk-adapted surveillance.
Papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential (PUNLMP) is an uncommon non-muscle-invasive bladder tumor. Its indolent nature often leads to underestimation of diagnostic complexity and recurrence risk, particularly in real-world practice where pathological distinction from low-grade carcinoma can be subtle. To characterize the clinical, imaging, and pathological profiles of PUNLMP in a contemporary cohort, with a specific exploratory focus on diagnostic misclassification rates and treatment patterns, contextualized by a systematic review of the literature. This was a retrospective case series of five patients with histologically confirmed PUNLMP following transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) at a single tertiary center (2023–2024). We collected comprehensive data on demographics, imaging, pathology, surgical management, and follow-up outcomes (median follow-up: 12 months; range 12–24). A systematic review of PubMed and Web of Science (2005–2024) was performed to synthesize existing evidence on recurrence and progression. The cohort comprised three males and two females, with a median age of 54 years (range, 25–76). Mean tumor diameter was 1.54 cm. Notably, two of five cases (40%) were initially misclassified as low-grade urothelial carcinoma on preliminary pathological review, representing an exploratory observation of real-world diagnostic pitfall. All patients underwent complete TURBT followed by a single immediate intravesical chemotherapy instillation. During follow-up, one patient (20%) experienced a local recurrence (PUNLMP) at 12 months, with no progression observed. Pooled analysis of 453 cases from seven eligible studies showed the overall recurrence rate of PUNLMP was 21.2% (95%CI: 17.7%–25.2%, I² = 0%) calculated via generalized linear mixed models, and a pooled progression rate below 2% estimated by the DerSimonian–Laird method. Subgroup analysis showed no significant difference in recurrence between adult and paediatric cohorts ( P = 0.6845). TURBT plus immediate intravesical instillation represented the predominant adult management strategy. This exploratory case series suggests that PUNLMP carries a non-negligible recurrence risk despite its low malignant potential. The preliminarily observed initial misclassification rate highlights the potential value of standardized pathological review. Our findings advocate for risk-adapted surveillance rather than a one-size-fits-all low-risk protocol, pending validation in larger prospective cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: