Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study finds high teaching workload correlates with lower perceived institutional support among transnational engineering faculty, highlighting governance challenges in joint programs.
Transnational higher education (TNE) partnerships between Chinese and UK universities continue to expand. However, the structural conditions that shape teaching quality and the governance arrangements through which they are managed remain under-theorised from a faculty-centred perspective. Drawing on a survey-based mixed-methods cross-sectional study of 56 teaching staff (80% response rate) at a Sino-British dual-degree engineering programme in western China, this study provides single-case evidence that teaching workload was the strongest observed negative correlate of perceived institutional support/satisfaction. Total weekly teaching load was moderately and negatively associated with the overall support/satisfaction composite (Spearman’s ρ = −0.49, p < 0.001). Non-parametric paired comparisons showed that teaching facilities were the only support dimension that differed significantly between the two institutional contexts, with a moderate effect; the remaining dimensions showed no significant differences. Internal consistency was acceptable to good. Qualitative thematic analysis identified three faculty adaptation strategies: simplifying and contextualising course materials, using bilingual instructional resources, and scaffolding peer-based discussion. Exploratory teaching-method comparisons involving 13 paired tests, interpreted descriptively, indicated higher reported use of reflection exercises and project-based learning at the joint school campus. An exploratory, perception-based engagement paradox also emerged: faculty reported a higher proportion of students showing >75% active participation at the joint school campus (85.7%) than at the parent institution (70.4% of valid responses), despite rating joint-school infrastructure lower. This finding requires student-level validation. The study contributes an empirically grounded, faculty-centred account of workload governance in transnational partnerships, using the Sino-British case as an illustrative test site.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kajan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: