Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Repeated cross-sectional study reveals increased adoption readiness and perceived learning benefits for AI chatbots among STEM students, suggesting growing integration into higher education.
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots are increasingly prominent in higher education, but temporal evidence on student perceptions remains limited in English-medium transnational STEM education. This repeated cross-sectional study surveyed students at a Sino-British engineering institution in Spring 2023 (Wave 1; N = 165) and Spring 2025 (Wave 2; N = 297), and found that familiarity (37.6% vs. 67.3%; OR = 3.43), willingness (55.8% vs. 77.8%; OR = 2.78), comfort (63.6% vs. 74.4%; OR = 1.66), and perceived overall learning enhancement (46.1% vs. 69.0%; OR = 2.61) were higher in 2025. In a respondent-level model combining Wave 1 with the Spring four-programme subset (analytic N = 426), survey wave remained associated with willingness after adjustment for programme and year (OR = 3.51, 95% CI 2.17–5.69, p < 0.001). In the Wave 2 Spring concern checklist (N = 297), accuracy (51.5%) and deduplicated over-reliance (50.2%) were the leading concerns; because the concern blocks differed in format and options, specific concerns cannot be shown to have increased or matured. The findings indicate higher population-level adoption readiness, not individual progression or routine use. “Concern maturation” remains a hypothesis requiring invariant instruments and panel designs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kajan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: