Spatial modeling study demonstrates refined probabilistic flood risk assessment in river basins, indicating improved guidance for stratified emergency evacuation and rescue planning.
Flood disaster risk assessment serves as an important foundation for formulating regional sustainable development strategies. This study establishes a risk assessment model for flood disasters in small and medium-sized rivers based on a theoretical framework integrating Geographic Information Systems (GIS), the Delphi method, and Bayesian networks (Delphi–BNs). An indicator system for the assessment was developed from three dimensions: hazard, vulnerability, and exposure. Hazard is represented by flood inundation area and depth; vulnerability is indicated by population distribution and economic layout; and exposure is reflected by road accessibility. By constructing a GIS-based Bayesian network and employing the Delphi method to create a probabilistic and spatially explicit model, this approach quantifies various sources of uncertainty in the assessment process, enabling a probabilistic expression of risk. Based on the risk assessment results, a stratified, phased flood emergency rescue and personnel transfer plan was established, designating extremely high-risk areas as the core zones for the first phase of personnel transfer, high-risk areas as the second-phase rescue zones, and medium-risk areas as the third-phase rescue zones, thereby providing clear operational guidance for flood emergency response in the basin. The Delphi–BN assessment framework developed in this study focuses on the core elements of flood disaster risk formation, organically integrates expert experience with spatial big data, and effectively overcomes the limitations of traditional assessment methods, such as strong subjectivity, insufficient accuracy, and poor quantification. It achieves a refined and quantitative assessment of flood risk in small and medium-sized river basins in semi-arid regions. The outcomes of this research contribute to a clearer understanding of both the driving mechanisms and the spatial patterns of regional flood risk. Furthermore, they establish a scientifically credible and operationally relevant foundation for key disaster-response decisions, encompassing timely emergency actions, phased population transfers, and the optimized deployment of limited emergency resources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: