Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study uncovers distinct genetic alterations and larger tumor sizes without survival differences in hemorrhagic glioblastoma, suggesting hemorrhage does not worsen prognosis.
Glioblastoma isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype (GBM) has been reclassified based on molecular and phenotypic features. Intratumoral hemorrhage is a phenotypic subtype with poorly understood molecular and clinical characteristics. We aimed to characterize the molecular profile and outcomes of hemorrhagic glioblastoma (hGBM) compared with non-hGBM. A retrospective analysis of GBMs with pre-operative and post-operative MRI and comprehensive next-generation sequencing of 205 genes was performed. Patients were classified as hGBM or non-hGBM using the Visually Accessible Rembrandt Images criteria. Univariable and multivariable survival analyses were performed. Genes were compared using the Fisher-exact test and corrected for multiple comparisons with the Benjamini-Hochberg method. 176 patients were included, of whom 105 had hGBM. Compared to non-hGBMs, hGBMs were more likely Hispanic (20.0% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.018), presented with motor deficits (38.0% vs. 21.1%, p = 0.020), and had larger tumors (147.6 cm 3 vs. 122.2 cm 3 , p = 0.034). In addition, hGBMs harbored less frequently PDGFRA (13.3% vs. 26.8%, p = 0.031), KIT (8.5% vs. 19.7%, p = 0.040), KDR (6.6% vs. 18.3%, p = 0.027), or PIK3R1 (2.8% vs. 11.3%, p = 0.030) alterations, and a higher frequency of SETD2 alterations (8.5% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.050). These differences were not significant after multiple comparison corrections. No differences in progression-free survival (8.2 vs. 8.3 months, p = 0.337) or overall survival (18.4 vs. 19.7 months, p = 0.800) were identified by hemorrhagic status. hGBMs might be associated with lower frequencies of PDGFRA , KIT , KDR , and PIK3R1 alterations and higher frequencies of SETD2 alterations compared to non-hGBMs. No outcome differences were observed by intratumoral hemorrhage status in this cohort.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bueno et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: