Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Numerical simulation reveals swelling-induced damage evolution in expansive mudstone tunnels, indicating that reinforced support substantially mitigates crown settlement.
Expansive mudstone tunnels often suffer long-term convergence and support damage because excavation-induced unloading is coupled with water-induced swelling. This study proposes a particle flow modeling framework for expansive mudstone tunnels by linking tunnel-wall displacement, swelling pressure, and the equivalent particle radius expansion coefficient. Constant-volume swelling pressure tests were first conducted to determine the representative swelling pressure of the mudstone. An independent confined particle model was then established to calibrate the relationship between macroscopic swelling pressure and microscopic particle expansion. The results show that a stable swelling pressure of 300 kPa corresponds to an equivalent particle radius expansion coefficient of 3.11%. Incorporating this calibrated swelling mechanism into the tunnel model indicates that swelling intensifies excavation-induced damage, increasing the final crack number from 1566 to 1852 and enlarging the equivalent damage-zone diameter from 21.6 m to 22.8 m. Under the original support scheme, the damage depth reaches 5.45 m, and the final crown settlement reaches 177.6 mm. After reinforcement, these values decrease to 3.40 m and 81.1 mm, respectively. Field monitoring confirms the predicted deformation-control trend. The proposed framework provides a practical approach for simulating swelling-induced damage evolution and optimizing support design in expansive mudstone tunnels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cui et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: