Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Validation study demonstrates efficient real-time fish detection on embedded hardware with ULFD-YOLO, suggesting practical viability for edge-based aquatic monitoring.
Continuous, non-invasive fish monitoring supports aquatic animal management, biodiversity assessment, and sustainable aquaculture, but embedded deployment requires a careful balance among accuracy, speed, memory, and computation under visually degraded underwater conditions. We developed ULFD-YOLO, an ultra-lightweight detector derived from YOLOv11n through coordinated redesign of the backbone, neck, and detection head. The model combines a custom convolutional MobileNetV4-tiny backbone, a hypergraph-based multi-scale fusion neck, and a lightweight MBConv head with channel attention. Experiments were conducted on Fish-BJ, an in-house dataset of 3402 images covering 21 species-informed aquarium-fish detection categories, and on a deliberately difficult 1180-image WildFish subset after dataset-specific training. On Fish-BJ, ULFD-YOLO achieved 0.960 mAP@0.5 and 0.732 mAP@0.5:0.95 with 1.3 M parameters, 2.6 GFLOPs, and a 3.0 MB model file, reducing parameters and computation by 50.0% and 58.7% relative to YOLOv11n. Bootstrap resampling yielded 95% confidence intervals of 0.946–0.973 and 0.638–0.821 for the two metrics, respectively. The model achieved 0.803 mAP@0.5 on WildFish and 19–24 FPS at 448 × 640 on a Jetson Orin Nano under its 15 W nvpmodel power mode. These results establish a practical accuracy–efficiency trade-off for embedded fish monitoring rather than peak localization accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: