Objectives To evaluate the performance of modified Poisson regression using cluster-weighted generalized estimating equations (MP-CWGEE) for estimating risk ratios in longitudinal data with informative cluster sizes (ICSs). Methods Using a comprehensive Monte Carlo simulation study, we evaluated the finite-sample performance of MP-CWGEE relative to five competing approaches: (1) modified Poisson regression using (unweighted) generalized estimating equations (MP-GEE), (2) log-binomial regression using cluster-weighted generalized estimating equations (LB-CWGEE), (3) log-binomial regression using (unweighted) generalized estimating equations (LB-GEE), (4) log-binomial mixed effects model (LB-MM), and (5) Poisson mixed effects model (Pois-MM). We conducted 1,000 simulations across 324 simulation scenarios, spanning different ICS mechanisms, informativeness degrees, sample sizes, exposure effects, within-person correlations, and exposure-covariate associations. Performance metrics included convergence rate, empirical bias, standard error ratio, coverage rate, and empirical Type I error rate. MP-CWGEE’s practical application was demonstrated in a cohort study of 423 people who used illicit opioids in New York City. Results MP-CWGEE recovered the individual-averaged marginal risk ratio with negligible bias, near-nominal coverage and Type I error, and perfect convergence across all scenarios, including under high ICS. The unweighted marginal estimators were biased under ICS, and the log-binomial approaches converged less reliably. The Pois-MM performed comparably to MP-CWGEE, but requires a random-effects specification and yields a conditional (cluster-specific) rather than a marginal interpretation. Conclusions MP-CWGEE offers a robust modeling approach for estimating risk ratios in longitudinal data with ICSs. Implementation code for R, Stata, and SAS is provided to facilitate wider adoption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bather et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: