Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In order to create a well-functioning internal market for Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems, the European Commission recently proposed the Artificial Intelligence Act. However, this legislative proposal pays limited attention to the health-specific risks the use of AI poses to patients’ rights. This article outlines that fundamental rights impacts associated with AI such as discrimination, diminished privacy and opaque decision-making are exacerbated in the context of health and may threaten the protection of foundational values and core patients’ rights. However, while the EU is facilitating and promoting the use and availability of AI in the health sector in Europe via the Digital Single Market, it is unclear whether it can provide the concomitant patients’ rights protection. This article theorizes the Europeanization of health AI by exploring legal challenges through a patients’ rights lens in order to determine if the European regulatory approach for AI provides for sufficient protection to patients’ rights. health law, artificial intelligence, patients’ rights, fundamental rights, digital single market, EU governance, EU regulation
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hannah van Kolfschooten (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: