Simulation study demonstrates improved resilience against overt and stealth spoofing in autonomous aerial teams, indicating the value of separating coherence from reference correctness.
Autonomous aerial teams can remain internally coherent while collectively acting on a corrupted mission reference. This technical report introduces Propagation-Aware Stabilization for Mission Assurance (PAS-MA), a supervisory architecture that separates collective coherence from mission-reference correctness and governs when shared belief is permitted to acquire mission authority. PAS-MA preserves quorum-dominant autonomy while incorporating failure-diverse minority assurance mechanisms designed to challenge exceptional states without becoming an alternate command system. In matched synthetic C-sUAS experiments, PAS-MA achieved 50/50 mission successes under the tested overt and stealth spoofing conditions, compared with 22/50 for W-MSR and 0/50 for fixed consensus in each condition. Under deliberately harsher shared-failure conditions, assured mission success fell to 0/50 despite preserved local task opportunities, exposing a coherent-but-wrong failure boundary central to the proposed architecture. Additional computational experiments characterize evidence-dependence and availability limits, protected-reference failure, conservative minority governance, and capacity/tempo saturation. The results support PAS-MA as a falsifiable mission-assurance research framework rather than an operationally validated system. This work is an unclassified, platform-agnostic computational proof of concept using synthetic data. It does not claim operational effectiveness, technology readiness, validation for a particular aircraft or mission, or immunity to arbitrary compromise. Implementation-specific tuning rules, deployable software logic, detailed sensor-selection trade studies, operational tactics, and other engineering particulars are intentionally outside the scope of this public preprint.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matthew Dominik (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: